(she/her) Just a lesbian doing art stuff, always down to nerd out about stuff. If ur into any of the following - fascism, transphobia, biphobia, aphobia, pedophilia, and other bigotry/unpleasantry - kindly fuck off! See my about for more :)
if yall r ever in Barcelona I very much recommend the restaurant El Nacional,,, i had this hella gr8 squid
No shade or anything (honestly) but memes that glorify Sam's contribution to the Fellowship's destruction of the One Ring over others' rankle a little because Frodo "If You Do Not Find A Way, No One Will" Baggins carried that fucking thing longer and farther than anybody else and it broke him so completely that he had to leave Middle Earth to find any sort of lasting healing and that's so goddamn sad.
So like, no, the Ring could not have been destroyed without all of them working together, but any perspective that cheapens Frodo's courage, strength against an invisible enemy or sacrifice puts my hackles up and I Do. Not. Like.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk, no I will not be taking questions at this time.
At the end of the day, I think the thing that stands out to me about what makes Frodo so heroic is that Frodo volunteered. Could Sam have done it? I don't know. I think the narrative says no, and Tolkien says no, but I know he modeled Sam after some of the rural soldiers he fought with in WWI, people he really looked up to and admired for their resilience and strength, so who knows. But the point is that Frodo stood up when no one else did, and that's what makes him different. Not only did he stand up, he stood up without any pride or ambition whatsoever. He saw that something needed to be done, so he did it. In the end, it cost him his life.
Another thing I think that separates Frodo from the rest is ultimately what saved the mission - the pity and mercy he extended to Gollum. Would anyone else in the party have given Gollum the time of day, let alone spared his life? Doubtful. And yet Tolkien says this:
"The Quest was bound to fail as a world-plan, and also was bound to end in disaster as the story of humble Frodo’s development to the “noble”, his sanctification. Fail it would and did as far as Frodo considered alone was concerned. He “apostatized”–and I have had one savage letter, crying out that he should have been executed as a traitor, not honoured. Believe me, it was not until I read this that I had myself any idea how “topical” such a situation might appear…
But at this point the “salvation” of the world and Frodo’s own “Salvation” is achieve by his previous pity and forgiveness of injury. At any point any prudent person would have told Frodo that Gollum would certainly betray him, and could rob him in the end. To “pity” him, to forbear to kill him, was a piece of folly, or a mystical belief in the ultimate value-in-itself of pity and generosity even if disastrous in the world of time. He did rob him and injure him in the end–but by a “grace”, that last betrayal was at a precise juncture when the final evil deed was the most beneficial thing any one could have done for Frodo! By a situation created by his “forgiveness”, he saved himself, and relieved of his burden. He was very justly accorded the highest honors–since it is clear that he & Sam never concealed the precise course of events.